Tuesday, October 02, 2018

Our Church and State website has come under a blistering attack. And Facebook's 47th block against the site remains in place despite my appeal (WITH UPDATE 4/10/2018)

This is a splendid posting which in its moderate and modest tone should encourage many others to join you!!
http://churchandstate.org.uk/about/
-Don Collins, President of ISAF, an NGO dedicated to helping women

Our Church and State website has no less than 40 Nobel Prize winners on it; for details, see this blog's sidebar under "Church and State" (updated today).


In the last 40 minutes access to our Church and State website has been blocked an unprecedented 11 times, with seemingly no end in sight. (SiteGround is paid $1,000 per year to host our site and manage the server.) This brings the total number of blocks today to 12, breaking the previous all-time record of 10 blocks in one day, which was set on 7 May 2017.



We are also currently dealing with Facebook's latest block against Church and State; see my previous blog post of 30 September, Facebook: The social network's 47th block against our Church and State website since 1 December 2015. No explanation provided as usual (WITH UPDATE - DAY 2 1/10/2018). And the category pages on Church and State remain under constant attack. For example, as I point out in my most recent blog post about Royal Mail misdelivering our mail, the second article below has more than 1/2 million Facebook likes/shares (not zero):



These are the blocks on access to Church and State so far today:

1,349th 2 October 2018, 4.02am
1,350th 2 October 2018, 6.19pm
1,351st 2 October 2018, 6.21pm
1,352nd 2 October 2018, 6.23pm
1,353rd 2 October 2018, 6.28pm
1,354th 2 October 2018, 6.32pm
1,355th 2 October 2018, 6.34pm
1,356th 2 October 2018, 6.35pm
1,357th 2 October 2018, 6.39pm
1,358th 2 October 2018, 6.40pm
1,359th 2 October 2018, 6.48pm
1,360th 2 October 2018, 6.53pm (12)

UPDATES

1,361st 2 October 2018, 9.19pm (+1)
1,362nd 3 October 2018, 5.32am
1,363rd 3 October 2018, 9.39am
1,364th 4 October 2018, 3.16am
Update Summation 4 October 2018

1,364 blocks on access to our Church and State website since 26 July 2016 (89 blocks 2016; 871 blocks 2017; 404 blocks 2018); 53 blocks last May that included 6 blocks on 8 May, the same day as Declan's updated complaint to the United Nations; 34 blocks last month; 19 blocks this month; 20 blocks this week that includes an all-time record-breaking 13 blocks on 2 October; 1 block so far today (as of 4 October at 11.12am).

January 2018: 55 blocks
February 2018: 45 blocks
March 2018: 59 blocks
April 2018: 42 blocks
May 2018: 53 blocks
June 2018: 38 blocks
July 2018: 31 blocks
August 2018: 28 blocks
September 2018: 34 blocks
October 2018: 19 blocks (ongoing)

27 June 2018: SITE BLOCKS: The blocks on access to our Church and State website continue unabated (WITH UPDATE 4/10/2018: re 1,364th block since 26 July 2016)

Re: Investigatory Powers Tribunal

The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) dismissed Declan's complaint against the secret services on papers in less than three weeks, on 1 September 2011, stating that it was "obviously unsustainable". This is paragraph 11 of Declan's updated complaint to the United Nations under Article 19 (freedom of expression) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

11. The IPT was created in October 2000 by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act and given the power to investigate any complaints against GCHQ, MI5 or MI6, as well as complaints about surveillance operations mounted by the police or any other public bodies. The Guardian reported on 5 March 2014 that the tribunal, which claims to be completely independent of the UK Government, is secretly operating from a base within the Home Office, by which it is funded. The newspaper found that the IPT had investigated about 1,500 complaints and upheld only 10, five of which concerned members of one family who had all lodged complaints about surveillance by their local council. No complaint against any of the intelligence agencies had ever been upheld. The discovery that the IPT is lodged within a Whitehall department fuelled criticisms of the tribunal that had been levelled by rights groups, lawyers and complainants. The IPT's critics complain that the secrecy is excessive and that its procedures are stacked so heavily in favour of the government and against complainants that it is fundamentally unfair. According to The Guardian, some senior lawyers have described the IPT as "Kafkaesque", while one eminent barrister has dismissed it as a "kangaroo court". The newspaper also reports that because of the secrecy surrounding the tribunal and the perception that it is unfair, many would-be complainants spurn it.

Click to enlarge

Updated complaint to the United Nations: https://issuu.com/lolaheavey/docs/un-complaint-may-2018





Is Edward Snowden a Hero or Criminal? This is a solid documentary called #Citizenfour that may influence your thinking either way:



JOIN THE CONVERSATION #CITIZENFOUR

From My Picks:

8 May 2018: Threat to life: Updated complaint to the United Nations under Article 19 (freedom of expression) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Today we are cut off the internet for a half an hour


http://churchandstate.org.uk/honorary-associates/