Thursday, October 28, 2010

The High Court (Judicial Review): Letter before claim

Jobcentre Plus (JCP) is an executive agency of the Department for Work and Pensions. It was JCP that put us to the street in 2006 and kept us there for more than 2 1/2 years because Declan didn't "sign on" TWO DAYS BEFORE he was due to do so on 29 September 2006 (see blog of 21 June 2010 Department for Work and Pensions double breaches the Data Protection Act: Letter to the Information Commissioner). Their unaccountability then went all the way - Declan exhausted the appeals process from the street, where his case was dismissed by Mr Justice Walker of the High Court (Judicial Review), Lord Justice Scott Baker of the Court of Appeal and the European Court of Human Rights despite that he was denied the internal appeals process by procedural impropriety on the part of the enforcement authority.

Last month Declan appealed the decision of our jobcentre, Highgate JCP, not to refer proposed variations of his jobseekers agreement to the decision maker (the Secretary of State) in accordance with Section 9(6) of the Jobseekers Act 1995. Just as we expected they would, the Jobcentre has simply ignored the appeal (archived here). It is a loophole in the Jobseekers Act that although a jobcentre must forward proposed variations of a jobseekers agreement to the decision maker if asked to do so by the claimant, there is no way for the claimant to force compliance. This time around, with a roof still over our heads, Declan is wasting no time with the pre-action protocol for judicial review (click to enlarge):



With the advent of the “War on Terror”, the role of religion in political conflicts has become paramount and NAC, responding to the challenge, has broadened its scope to question the premises upon which the “war” is based. Last week WikiLeaks released the largest classified military leak in history. The 391,832 reports ('The Iraq War Logs'), document the war and occupation in Iraq from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2009 (except for the months of May 2004 and March 2009) as told by soldiers in the United States Army. According to the BBC, the leaking of the documents is likely to increase pressure on governments to release details of civilian casualties in future conflicts.


PROMO from TBIJ on Vimeo.

Also last week, the UK Government published the post-mortem report on British weapons inspector Dr David Kelly. Kelly's body was found in woodlands close to his Oxfordshire home in 2003, after it emerged that he had given information for a BBC news story questioning the government's claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. In their article Did MI5 kill Dr David Kelly?, Global Research reported that Kelly was planning to write a book that could have violated the Official Secrets Act.


The Man Who Knew Too Much? from Field Agent C on Vimeo.