Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Now we can't even receive an email and attachments twice sent, and if Declan can't sign the attachments he could be prosecuted or N4CM removed from the UK's Companies House register of companies

Mayor of London Boris Johnson

Last night a programme that allowed me to open particular email attachments was uninstalled from Declan's laptop. I had to find the programme on the internet and reinstall what Declan had been using only hours earlier. It was the second time in a little over a month that we have had items deleted from a laptop (see blog post of 20 August, "I thought I could start work on Margaret Sanger's writings this morning. Not at all, they were all deleted overnight").

This morning we woke up to an email in Declan's inbox without its attachments. Even with a company representative on hold over the telephone, who assured us that she had sent the email a second time at 8.43am, we couldn't receive the email with or without its attachments. This is something Declan was well used to when he used to look for Honorary Associates and signatories for our online petition (now signed by 29 Nobel Laureates), but in this instance the ramifications are seismic if he cannot sign these attachments in so far as he could be prosecuted or Network for Church Monitoring (N4CM) removed from the UK's Companies House register of companies.

Interception and manipulation of electronic communications are just two of several issues Declan deals with in his complaint to the United Nations that he is currently updating. Earlier this month he filed a case against the Mayor of London's Greater London Authority (GLA) at the Central London County Court. In my next blog post I will publish an extract from the updated complaint to the UN dealing with the GLA's termination of our eligibility for our flat without the right of review or appeal.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Citizenfour Official Trailer 1 (2014) - Edward Snowden Documentary HD



JOIN THE CONVERSATION #CITIZENFOUR

'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty

http://churchandstate.org.uk/about/

http://churchandstate.org.uk/letter-from-the-chairman/

http://churchandstate.org.uk/category/church-and-state-press/

If you would like to help us personally, please feel free to pick up one of our books (shameless plug, I know, but every sale helps us to work our way out of our precarious situation). There is currently five books available in Church and State Press here, and all proceeds from the first four of these books go to us with the authors' permission. Thank you all for all the support you have given us, and I hope we can keep our Church and State website going despite the constant threats.


Thursday, September 17, 2015

Not even a registered letter to the Mayor of London's Clearing House service is delivered

Mayor of London Boris Johnson

Heavey v The Greater London Authority

In the Central London County Court

In the matter of a claim for damages against the Greater London Authority for depriving the Claimant of his right of review, in respect of its decision to terminate his and his wife's eligibility for their flat, and opportunity to appeal the outcome of the review to an independent tribunal if he was not satisfied.

Extract re GLA Clearing House operated for the Mayor of London by St Mungo's Broadway

14(ii) On 26 August 2015 the Claimant discovered that the information that came back from GLA Clearing House following his Subject Access Request failed to comply with a County Court order dated 8 May 2015 requesting that it removes from its website unlawfully held information about the Claimant and his wife relating to their debts, their employment status and their alleged mental health condition. At a hearing on 8 May 2015, the Court found sufficient evidence that SHP had acted unlawfully in holding or uploading information about the Claimant relating to his debts, his employment status and an alleged mental health condition and ordered it to pay damages to him for distress of £750.

See previous blog post: Threat to life and wellbeing: Our claim against the Greater London Authority filed at the Central London County Court this afternoon


Royal Mail Track and Trace 17 September 2015

"We have your item"

Click to enlarge

Letter posted 24 July 2015

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty

http://churchandstate.org.uk/about/

http://churchandstate.org.uk/letter-from-the-chairman/

http://churchandstate.org.uk/category/church-and-state-press/

If you would like to help us personally, please feel free to pick up one of our books (shameless plug, I know, but every sale helps us to work our way out of our precarious situation). There is currently five books available in Church and State Press here, and all proceeds from the first four of these books go to us with the authors' permission. Thank you all for all the support you have given us, and I hope we can keep our Church and State website going despite the constant threats.



Thursday, September 10, 2015

Threat to life and wellbeing: Our claim against the Greater London Authority filed at the Central London County Court this afternoon

Mayor of London Boris Johnson

Heavey v The Greater London Authority

In the Central London County Court

Brief details of claim

The Claimant challenges the Defendant for depriving him of his right of review in respect of its decision to refer him and his wife from the Mayor of London’s Housing First programme to the Mayor’s Clearing House programme (the “referral decision”), thereby terminating their eligibility for their flat because they are able to live independently. On 12 August 2015 the High Court refused the Claimant permission to apply for Judicial Review, principally because his Claim Form was not filed within 3 months after the grounds to make the claim arose on 4 September 2014. It is evident from the email the Claimant received on 4 September 2014, judicial review pre-action correspondence and the Defendant’s Grounds of Defence (in particular paragraph 13) that the Claimant has been repeatedly deprived of his right of review, and that the Defendant has not properly considered the impact of the referral decision on his family life. It has not taken into account the Claimant and his wife’s needs and vulnerable position as rough sleepers for almost 4 years in total. The Claimant is therefore making an application to the Court for a declaration that the Defendant has acted unlawfully and an order that it reviews the referral decision and provides the Claimant with the opportunity to appeal to an independent tribunal if he is not satisfied with the outcome.

Value

The Claimant expects to recover damages for distress of not more than £1,000.



Threat to life and wellbeing (paragraphs 16 and 17):



Extract re GLA Clearing House operated for the Mayor of London by St Mungo's Broadway

14(ii) On 26 August 2015 the Claimant discovered that the information that came back from GLA Clearing House following his Subject Access Request failed to comply with a County Court order dated 8 May 2015 requesting that it removes from its website unlawfully held information about the Claimant and his wife relating to their debts, their employment status and their alleged mental health condition. At a hearing on 8 May 2015, the Court found sufficient evidence that SHP had acted unlawfully in holding or uploading information about the Claimant relating to his debts, his employment status and an alleged mental health condition and ordered it to pay damages to him for distress of £750.

Click to enlarge

As Declan states in paragraph 15 of his particulars of claim, before he issued court proceedings against the Single Homeless Project (SHP) for unlawfully holding or uploading information about him relating to his debts, his employment status and alleged grandiosity, the Chairman of Network for Church Monitoring, Dr. Stephen D. Mumford, founder and President of the North Carolina-based Center for Research on Population and Security, provided the homeless charity with this strong rebuttal of their now fully discredited claim that both he and I are mentally ill:

Click to enlarge

Church and State website

Church and State Press

'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty

***

We were evicted from our previous flat on 14 March 2013 because according to our then live-in landlady's ex-husband, Dr Nigel McKenzie, a consultant psychiatrist in Highgate Mental Health Centre, our flat was needed for somebody with a mental illness. As Declan mentions in paragraph 16(ii) of his particulars of claim above, former MI5 whistleblower David Shayler also lived with human rights activist Belinda McKenzie in the same political 'safe house' for a couple of years until 2007. It is unfortunate Shayler then declared that he was the Messiah, became a squatter, and was subsequently ridiculed in the press for changing his name to Delores Kane. A New Statesman article dated 11 September 2006 featuring Shayler and Belinda gives no indication that Shayler believed he was the Messiah at that time; whilst a Daily Mail interview with Shayler explicitly shows he believed himself to be Jesus by June 2007. He has never regained his normal self.


The Esquire article below* is mentioned in a Guardian article dated 27 March 2012. It is an eye-opener, highlighting the monitoring and surveillance that Shayler had to live with back in 2000, and the contradictory briefings and slanders that were coming out of the British establishment and the media. The author, Dr Eamonn O'Neill, is a lecturer in journalism at Strathclyde University.

*On 2 May 2013, Issuu removed this pdf from my Issuu account following a copyright complaint by Hearst Communications. I had uploaded the article to my Issuu account in December 2012. In March 2013, when last I checked, the article had been viewed more than 15,000 times. It can be viewed here.

BBC PANORAMA: The David Shayler Affair (August 1998)

According to BBC Panorama, Shayler "caused the biggest crisis of official secrecy since the spy catcher affair". In 2002, he was jailed for seven weeks for breaking the Official Secrets Act.

Thursday, September 03, 2015

Greater London Authority (County Court): We have found our precedent case in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights

Mayor of London Boris Johnson

Heavey v Greater London Authority

In the Central London County Court

In the matter of a claim for damages against the Greater London Authority for depriving the Claimant of his right of review, in respect of its decision to terminate his and his wife's eligibility for their flat, and opportunity to appeal the outcome of the review to an independent tribunal if he was not satisfied.

From Particulars of Claim

17. The Claimant contends that the Defendant’s decision to refer him and his wife to GLA Clearing House gives rise to a breach of their rights under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which provides that authorities must have respect for private and family life. In Connors v United Kingdom (2004), the European Court of Human Rights held that the eviction of a licensee and his family from the local authority gypsy caravan site was contrary to Article 8. The Court found that the legal framework applying to the occupation of pitches on local authority gypsy sites did not provide the family with sufficient procedural protection of their rights. Similarly, the legal framework applying to the referral of the Claimant and his wife to GLA Clearing House that has deprived the Claimant of a review of the decision has not provided them with sufficient procedural protection of their rights. Special consideration should be given to the Claimant and his wife’s needs and the opposition they encounter because of their vulnerable position as rough sleepers for almost 4 years in total.

18. The Claimant is therefore making an application to the Court for a declaration that the Defendant has acted unlawfully and an order that it reviews its referral decision and provides the Claimant with the opportunity to appeal the outcome of the review to an independent tribunal if he is not satisfied. Alternatively, the Claimant seeks leave to appeal under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act.

'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty

http://churchandstate.org.uk/about/

http://churchandstate.org.uk/letter-from-the-chairman/

http://churchandstate.org.uk/category/church-and-state-press/

If you would like to help us personally, please feel free to pick up one of our books (shameless plug, I know, but every sale helps us to work our way out of our precarious situation). There is currently five books available in Church and State Press here, and all proceeds from the first four of these books go to us with the authors' permission. Thank you all for all the support you have given us, and I hope we can keep our Church and State website going despite the constant threats.