Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Mayor of London's Clearing House service withholds financial data against us in defiance of court ruling

Mayor of London Boris Johnson

According to the Notice of Issue I published in my previous blog post yesterday, the Mayor of London's Greater London Authority (GLA) has until close of business today to reply to Declan's claim in the Central London County Court that contests their termination of our eligibility for our flat without the right of review or appeal. We have not given up all hope of receiving from the Court the GLA's Acknowledgment of Service (see previous blog post, Letter of complaint re County Court at Central London: What will it take to get the Mayor of London's Greater London Authority's Acknowledgment of Service?). Under the Data Protection Act 1998 Declan will make a subject access request to the Court's Data Protection Officer for a copy of the document. One of the things that the GLA needs to explain to the Court is why the Mayor's Clearing House service continues to withhold financial and other data against us in defiance of a court ruling. This is an extract on the subject from an updated complaint to the United Nations that Declan is currently working on:

Extract from paragraph 39 of Declan's updated complaint to the United Nations

Re The Mayor of London's Clearing House service operated for the Mayor by St Mungo's Broadway

39(iii) On 26 August 2015 the Applicant discovered that the information that came back from GLA Clearing House following his Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act 1998 failed to comply with a Central London County Court order dated 8 May 2015 requesting that it removes from its website unlawfully held information about the Applicant and his wife relating to their debts, their employment status and their alleged mental health condition (see Annex 30, Greater London Authority: Order by County Court Judge Brooks, p. 82). At a hearing on 8 May 2015, the Court found sufficient evidence that SHP had acted unlawfully in holding or uploading information about the Applicant relating to his debts, his employment status and an alleged mental health condition and ordered it to pay damages to him for distress of £750. The Applicant remains concerned from a fraud point of view that GLA Clearing House withholds inaccurate financial information about the Applicant and his wife which gives the misleading impression that their salaries as employees of Network for Church Monitoring constitute a debt that each of them has incurred. In fact the money donated for the Applicant and his wife's salary for the past two years is no-recourse i.e. donations the donors do not expect money back for. (Emphasis added.)

Related blog post (10 September 2015): Threat to life and wellbeing: Our claim against the Greater London Authority filed at the Central London County Court this afternoon

This is the unlawfully held financial information GLA Clearing House retains against Declan, first created on 19 March 2014 and last withheld by GLA Clearing House Manager Kate Moon on 2 July 2015:

Other Debt: Yes

Debt details: Mr Heavey has an American benefactor who has financed his website in a salaried manner. This totals £6000.

Click to enlarge

Both of these declarations have been established by the Court to be false and misleading in their own right but especially in the context of other unqualified information that is withheld against us that speaks of our intention to obtain employment, not to mention our alleged possible qualification for Jobseeker's Allowance despite the fact that our salaries continue to exceed the amount permitted for either of us to make such a claim (see blog of 28 December 2014, "Heavey v Single Homeless Project: Will the Central London County Court rule we consented to declarations for online referral that we are paying our own salaries and that we are both mentally ill, and despite our photographic evidence to the contrary?").

Heavey vs. Single Homeless Project

County Court Judge Brooks

Upon being satisfied that the Defendant has incorrectly recorded information about the Claimant as to financial position, employment status and that he potentially has mental health problems and upon the Defendant confirming that it will destroy all electronic and paper information that it retains on the Claimant and his wife, Maria Heavey, and upon the Defendant confirming that it will contact St Mungo's Broadway and request that it removes from its website any information about the Claimant and Maria Heavey in relation to debts that they have, their employment status and to specially remove the word "grandiose"... (Emphasis added.)

Dated 8 May 2015

Click to enlarge

Before Declan issued court proceedings against the Single Homeless Project for unlawfully holding or uploading information about him relating to his debts, his employment status and alleged grandiosity, the Chairman of Network for Church Monitoring, Dr Stephen Mumford, founder and President of the North Carolina-based Center for Research on Population and Security, provided the homeless charity with this strong rebuttal of their now fully discredited claim that both he and I are mentally ill:

Click to enlarge

'Let me recommend an important web site Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty


We were evicted from our previous flat on 14 March 2013 because according to our then live-in landlady's ex-husband, Dr Nigel McKenzie, a consultant psychiatrist in Highgate Mental Health Centre, our flat was needed for somebody with a mental illness. Former MI5 whistleblower David Shayler also lived with human rights activist Belinda McKenzie in the same political 'safe house' for a couple of years until 2007. It is unfortunate Shayler then declared that he was the Messiah, became a squatter, and was subsequently ridiculed in the press for changing his name to Delores Kane. A New Statesman article dated 11 September 2006 featuring Shayler and Belinda gives no indication that Shayler believed he was the Messiah at that time; whilst a Daily Mail interview with Shayler explicitly shows he believed himself to be Jesus by June 2007. He has never regained his normal self.

The Esquire article below* is mentioned in a Guardian article dated 27 March 2012. It is an eye-opener, highlighting the monitoring and surveillance that Shayler had to live with back in 2000, and the contradictory briefings and slanders that were coming out of the British establishment and the media. The author, Dr Eamonn O'Neill, is a lecturer in journalism at Strathclyde University.

*On 2 May 2013, Issuu removed this pdf from my Issuu account following a copyright complaint by Hearst Communications. I had uploaded the article to my Issuu account in December 2012. In March 2013, when last I checked, the article had been viewed more than 15,000 times. It can be viewed here.

BBC PANORAMA: The David Shayler Affair (August 1998)

According to BBC Panorama, Shayler "caused the biggest crisis of official secrecy since the spy catcher affair". In 2002, he was jailed for seven weeks for breaking the Official Secrets Act.