What will it take to get a sealed order from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service?
Click to enlarge
Malicious intent? Single Homeless Project leave themselves until close of business today to comply with court order
Click to enlarge
Friday, May 22, 2015
Malicious intent? Single Homeless Project leave themselves until close of business today to comply with court order
Part 1 (6 May 2015): High Court Pre-Action Letter: Principal Solicitor for the Mayor of London's Greater London Authority threatens us with eviction by falsely accusing us of refusing support
Malicious Intent Law - Legal Definition
Malicious intent refers to the intent, without just cause or reason, to commit a wrongful act that will result in harm to another. It is the intent to harm or do some evil purpose.
Malicious intent refers to the intent, without just cause or reason, to commit a wrongful act that will result in harm to another. It is the intent to harm or do some evil purpose.
Following Declan's win against the Single Homeless Project in the Central London County Court on 8 May, we received this misaddressed and misdated letter from the charity's second in command two days ago:
Click to enlarge
Related Post (28 December 2014): Heavey v Single Homeless Project: Will the Central London County Court rule we consented to declarations for online referral that we are paying our own salaries and that we are both mentally ill, and despite our photographic evidence to the contrary?
SHP only have until close of business today to comply with District Judge Brooks' order. Earlier this week, Declan phoned Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to enquire about the sealed order that DJ Brooks assured him he would receive within two working days. He was told that the file was still with the Judge, however if need be we have this unsealed order to file in the High Court next week against the Greater London Authority (GLA):
Click to enlarge
By close of business last Wednesday, Greater London Authority Principal Solicitor Anna Condliffe had breached the pre-action protocol for judicial review by failing to respond to Declan's pre-action letter dated 6 May 2015. Perhaps a High Court judge will have to order compliance with procedural law before this solicitor, acting on behalf of the Mayor of London, retracts her misconceived threat to have us evicted from our home.
Related Post (5 November 2014): High Court rules that the Mayor of London bears no responsibility for his Greater London Authority (GLA) Housing First Programme
Tuesday, May 19, 2015
Our Church and State website is down for the third time (WITH UPDATES)
Part 1 (17 April 2015): SITEGROUND UPGRADE: Our Church and State website is down from the internet (WITH UPDATES)
Click to enlarge
We lost our Church and State website on 23 April, but fortunately, it was our American web host SiteGround's Varnish caching service that was the culprit so we recovered it quickly. Six days before, on 17 April, SiteGround blamed our WordPress database, which then corrected itself. Now SiteGround is blaming high traffic towards the server and a corrupt WordPress theme script for intermittent outages we have been experiencing since Saturday morning. This means we now have to buy and customize another theme for the site, that is on top of having to file an action against the Greater London Authority in the High Court in order to protect our tenancy.
According to Google Analytics, and despite all the outages, this article alone brought over 100,000 people to our site over the last few days:
Click to enlarge
Related Post (3 March 2015): Our Facebook "Like" counter is reduced in number and frozen after I post link in this blog to "How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations" (WITH UPDATE)
UPDATE 1 (20 May 2015, 8.50am): Our website has been down since 6.30pm yesterday evening. I ask SiteGround to tell us when we can expect to be able to access our site and phpMyAdmin. This note appears on our Support tab: "The server that hosts your account is experiencing problems at this moment. We kindly ask you not to submit tickets regarding the status of your website until we fix it." Our Support tab as it looks at the moment:
Click to enlarge
UPDATE 2 (20 May 2015, 11.26am): Following the restoration of our site, SiteGround asks us to bear in mind that they "perform regular maintenance related to software updates". I write back asking them if they could remove from our Support tab the note above stating that there are problems with the server, as it would appear from their response to be no longer applicable.
Church and State website
Church and State Press
'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty
If you would like to help us personally, please feel free to pick up one of our books (shameless plug, I know, but every sale helps us to work our way out of our precarious situation). There is currently five books available in Church and State Press here, and all proceeds from the first four of these books go to us with the authors' permission. Thank you all for all the support you have given us, and I hope we can keep our Church and State website going despite the constant threats.
Friday, May 08, 2015
Declan is vindicated in court and wins £750 in damages from the Single Homeless Project
Part 1 (6 May 2015): High Court Pe-Action Letter: Principal Solicitor for the Mayor of London's Greater London Authority threatens us with eviction by falsely accusing us of refusing support
Heavey v Single Homeless Project
Click to enlarge
Paragraph 37 of Declan's updated complaint to the United Nations
37. Furthermore, on 31 July 2014, the SHP sought the Applicant's signature on a support plan that stated that both his wife's blog (at http://network-of-those-abused-by-church.blogspot.co.uk) and their Church and State website (at http://churchandstate.org.uk) appear "to demonstrate" their thinking, that they "appear very grandiose" in their thinking, and that they both "demonstrate symptoms of mental ill health". This support plan was subsequently withdrawn; however, under the programme that the Applicant and his wife have been referred to by GLA Housing First, they would have faced eviction for non-compliance with such a support plan, thus adding further weight to their argument that the upholding of this referral by the Principal Solicitor of the GLA is unlawful. In fact, so intent was the SHP to hold these and other allegations against the Applicant and his wife, that the Applicant lodged a claim against the homelessness charity on 12 September 2014 before the County Court at Central London, challenging under the Data Protection Act 1998 the charity's claim that he and his wife consented to declarations for online referral that they were paying their own salaries as employees of N4CM and that they were both mentally ill. At a hearing of the case on 8 May 2015, the Court declared that SHP had acted unlawfully under the Act and ordered them to pay court costs and damages to the Applicant of £750. The Court took into account a strong rebuttal of SHP's financial and mental health accusations by N4CM Chairman Dr Stephen Mumford, founder and President of the Center for Research on Population and Security in North Carolina, USA. Dr Mumford attached with his mental health rebuttal of 15 August 2014 two of the Applicant and his wife's references for second jobs in care, one of which was written by a Harvard educated MD (then) based in London, stating:
37. Furthermore, on 31 July 2014, the SHP sought the Applicant's signature on a support plan that stated that both his wife's blog (at http://network-of-those-abused-by-church.blogspot.co.uk) and their Church and State website (at http://churchandstate.org.uk) appear "to demonstrate" their thinking, that they "appear very grandiose" in their thinking, and that they both "demonstrate symptoms of mental ill health". This support plan was subsequently withdrawn; however, under the programme that the Applicant and his wife have been referred to by GLA Housing First, they would have faced eviction for non-compliance with such a support plan, thus adding further weight to their argument that the upholding of this referral by the Principal Solicitor of the GLA is unlawful. In fact, so intent was the SHP to hold these and other allegations against the Applicant and his wife, that the Applicant lodged a claim against the homelessness charity on 12 September 2014 before the County Court at Central London, challenging under the Data Protection Act 1998 the charity's claim that he and his wife consented to declarations for online referral that they were paying their own salaries as employees of N4CM and that they were both mentally ill. At a hearing of the case on 8 May 2015, the Court declared that SHP had acted unlawfully under the Act and ordered them to pay court costs and damages to the Applicant of £750. The Court took into account a strong rebuttal of SHP's financial and mental health accusations by N4CM Chairman Dr Stephen Mumford, founder and President of the Center for Research on Population and Security in North Carolina, USA. Dr Mumford attached with his mental health rebuttal of 15 August 2014 two of the Applicant and his wife's references for second jobs in care, one of which was written by a Harvard educated MD (then) based in London, stating:
I personally know Declan and Lola Heavey. I can, in good faith, recommend them as caregivers to an elderly person in need. If they were offered such a position, I am confident that they would carry it out with more than the usual commitment and care.
Related Post (28 December 2014): Heavey v Single Homeless Project: Will the Central London County Court rule we consented to declarations for online referral that we are paying our own salaries and that we are both mentally ill, and despite our photographic evidence to the contrary?
Click to enlarge
Church and State website
Church and State Press
'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty
If you would like to help us personally, please feel free to pick up one of our books (shameless plug, I know, but every sale helps us to work our way out of our precarious situation). There is currently five books available in Church and State Press here, and all proceeds from the first four of these books go to us with the authors' permission. Thank you all for all the support you have given us, and I hope we can keep our Church and State website going despite the constant threats.
Wednesday, May 06, 2015
High Court Pre-Action Letter: Principal Solicitor for the Mayor of London's Greater London Authority threatens us with eviction by falsely accusing us of refusing support
Part 1: High Court rules that the Mayor of London bears no responsibility for his Greater London Authority (GLA) Housing First Programme
Heavey v Greater London Authority
High Court Pre-Action Letter
Excerpt (versus Single Homeless Project)
From Section 5, paragraph 10:
Furthermore, I have a hearing at the County Court at Central London on 8 May 2015 against SHP under the Data Protection Act 1998, challenging their claim that we consented to declarations for online referral that we are paying our own salaries as employees of Network for Church Monitoring (N4CM) and that we are both mentally ill, and despite our photographic evidence to the contrary. These financial and mental health accusations were refuted by N4CM Chairman Dr Stephen Mumford, founder and President of the Center for Research on Population and Security in North Carolina, USA, but to no avail. Dr Mumford attached with his mental health rebuttal two of our references for second jobs in care, one of which was written by a Harvard educated MD (then) based in London, stating:
From Section 5, paragraph 10:
Furthermore, I have a hearing at the County Court at Central London on 8 May 2015 against SHP under the Data Protection Act 1998, challenging their claim that we consented to declarations for online referral that we are paying our own salaries as employees of Network for Church Monitoring (N4CM) and that we are both mentally ill, and despite our photographic evidence to the contrary. These financial and mental health accusations were refuted by N4CM Chairman Dr Stephen Mumford, founder and President of the Center for Research on Population and Security in North Carolina, USA, but to no avail. Dr Mumford attached with his mental health rebuttal two of our references for second jobs in care, one of which was written by a Harvard educated MD (then) based in London, stating:
I personally know Declan and Lola Heavey. I can, in good faith, recommend them as caregivers to an elderly person in need. If they were offered such a position, I am confident that they would carry it out with more than the usual commitment and care.
Related blog: Heavey v Single Homeless Project: Will the Central London County Court rule we consented to declarations for online referral that we are paying our own salaries and that we are both mentally ill, and despite our photographic evidence to the contrary? (court hearing: 8 May)
This is our Chairman's strong rebuttal of the Single Homeless Project's view that Declan and I are both mentally ill:
Click to enlarge
Church and State website
Church and State Press
'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty
***
We were evicted from our previous flat on 14 March 2013 because according to our then live-in landlady's ex-husband, Dr Nigel McKenzie, a consultant psychiatrist in Highgate Mental Health Centre, our flat was needed for somebody with a mental illness. As Declan states in section 5, paragraph 14 of his High Court pre-action letter above, former MI5 whistleblower David Shayler also lived with human rights activist Belinda McKenzie in the same political 'safe house' for a couple of years until 2007. It is indeed unfortunate Shayler then declared that he was the Messiah, became a squatter, and was subsequently ridiculed in the press for changing his name to Delores Kane. A New Statesman article dated 11 September 2006 featuring Shayler and Belinda gives no indication that Shayler believed he was the Messiah at that time; whilst a Daily Mail interview with Shayler explicitly shows he believed himself to be Jesus by June 2007.
The Esquire article below* is mentioned in a Guardian article dated 27 March 2012. It is an eye-opener, highlighting the monitoring and surveillance that Shayler had to live with back in 2000, and the contradictory briefings and slanders that were coming out of the British establishment and the media. The author, Dr Eamonn O'Neill, is a lecturer in journalism at Strathclyde University.
*On 2 May 2013, Issuu removed this pdf from my Issuu account following a copyright complaint by Hearst Communications. I had uploaded the article to my Issuu account in December 2012. In March 2013, when last I checked, the article had been viewed more than 15,000 times. It can be viewed here.
BBC PANORAMA: The David Shayler Affair (August 1998)
According to BBC Panorama, Shayler "caused the biggest crisis of official secrecy since the spy catcher affair". In 2002, he was jailed for seven weeks for breaking the Official Secrets Act.
***Update (8 May 2015): Declan is vindicated in court and wins £750 in damages from the Single Homeless Project
