Church and State blog: Department for Work and Pensions rewrites our history

Thursday, May 06, 2010

Department for Work and Pensions rewrites our history

Our history with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was yesterday turned on its head - by the DWP! Jobcentre Plus (JCP) is an executive agency of the DWP. In a letter on behalf of JCP Chief Executive Darra Singh, we were informed this morning that we weren’t forced to live on the streets of London for more than 2 1/2 years because Declan failed to “sign on” TWO DAYS BEFORE he was due to do so on 29 September 2006 but because he failed to attend an appointment on 19 September 2006. Well, this is news to us!

When it comes to the “loss” of my National Insurance number off the Department’s computer system (see blog of 7 October 2009 “After a huge run, the Department for Work and Pensions denies me a crisis loan”), the DWP now makes out that I never had a National Insurance number to lose in the first place! They go on and on (archived here). The bottom line is that Declan’s complaint against JCP for refusing him access to a Starting a Business course that would enable him register NAC as a company limited by guarantee – lodged with the Independent Case Examiner last Friday (see previous blog) – remains intact. Below is Declan’s letter of reply to Singh, which will be forwarded by registered post to the Independent Case Examiner tomorrow.

Oops, it seems that we are extremely lucky to have the letter terminating our benefits archived here, and plenty of corroborative evidence archived there and elsewhere to boot. An application of mine dated 21 September 2009 nails them on my National Insurance number, a copy of which I retain on disc; if any of the information I provided to be reallocated a National Insurance number was deemed to be false, why have I got a National Insurance number now? Singh has plenty of questions to answer, and is now additionally looking at an application from Declan under the Data Protection Act for a copy of the document on file under his name that claims our benefits were terminated in September 2006 because he missed an appointment on 19 September. The fabrication of such evidence is surely a criminal offence, and should be dealt with accordingly.

Dear Mr Singh

Jobcentre Plus

I am writing to you as the chief executive of Jobcentre Plus (JCP), an executive agency of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). Please find enclosed a copy of a letter dated 5 May 2010 that I received this morning signed by Mr David Chapman on your behalf. I note that JCP continues to refuse me access to a Starting a Business course (as opposed to related workshops run by Business Link in London, such as their “Starting up a Social Enterprise” workshop, which I attended on 7 April), without explanation.

My wife suspects, as I believe, that my on-going abuse at the hands of JCP is almost certainly related to the Network of those Abused by Church (NAC) website we maintain at religionandmorality.net. I would be delighted to have a Starting a Business course, which would enable me to turn NAC into a registered company limited by guarantee, but JCP won't allow me to do that. I beg to point out that NAC is a world network organisation for exposing the public to the scientific perspective on public policy issues. It has a distinguished list of agreed Trustees pending the registration of the enterprise as a limited company as well as a distinguished and growing list of Honorary Associates, which includes two Nobel laureates. NAC's petition to the United Nations regarding therapeutic cloning is especially noteworthy; it has already been signed by no less than 28 Nobel laureates as well as hundreds of other distinguished scholars.

I can confirm that I am looking for a solicitor or counsel to represent me pro bono, who might be able to tell from your letter whether JCP is acting lawfully (a) by directing me to apply for specific jobs on threat of termination of my benefits, (b) by insisting on my taking a "training course" of the choosing of JCP, and (c) what can be done to prevent recurrence of this form of unfair treatment. Kindly note for your records:

• My joint claim for Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) was terminated on 27 September 2006 because I did not “sign on” TWO DAYS BEFORE I was due to do so on 29 September 2006.

• My wife and I were forced to live rough on the streets of London for more than 2 1/2 years, from 3 November 2006 to 13 July 2009.

• I exhausted the appeals process from the street, where my case was dismissed by Mr Justice Walker of the High Court (Judicial Review), Lord Justice Scott Baker of the Court of Appeal and three judges of the European Court of Human Rights in spite of the fact that I was denied the internal appeal process by procedural impropriety on the part of the enforcement authority (the DWP).

• My joint claim JSA was not even reinstated until 9 October 2009 – almost three months after we gained access to a roof over our heads – because my wife’s National Insurance number was “lost” from the Department’s computer system.

With reference to your last paragraph, please be advised that I have already written to the Independent Case Examiner (ICE) with my complaint against JCP for refusing me access to a Starting a Business course. I understand that my MP may be able to refer my complaint against JCP to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman if I am not happy with the reply or not that I have received from the ICE within the next 16 working days. If my MP is not so inclined, I will be seeking the assistance of my local Citizen’s Advice Bureau, again with this letter from you to hand to substantiate my claim.

Yours sincerely

Declan Heavey

cc Mr John Hanlon, The Independent Case Examiner (by registered post - together with enclosure herein referred to)

Church and State

MAYOR OF LONDON RSI PROPERTY
DAY 406 IN A WEEKLY PERIODIC TENANCY
SUBJECT TO A SECTION 21 NOTICE

(SEE PARA. 3 BELOW)

1. Our 308 Honorary Associates include 20 Nobel Prize laureates. Declan and I are engaged in a project that deals with the publication of issues significant to social policy in a number of key areas, e.g., climate change, population, futurism, atheism, and free speech. Established as Network for Church Monitoring, a non-profit company limited by guarantee, our main publication, found at the website, Church and State, calls attention to subjects, not the least which have been critical of the interaction between religious and secular institutions. We have been the target of numerous threats and actions, e.g., the former resulting in threats to Declan's life, and the latter, which have led to vandalism. The various incidents are on record with the police and other official agencies.

2. There are no less than 63 Nobel Prize laureates on the Church and State website from 20 Honorary Associates, eight articles, nine book excerpts and 33 petition signatories. (For example, one Nobel laureate signed our Nobel petition in support of human embryonic stem cell research and gave us permission to excerpt from one of his books.) Our list of associates also includes 18 US National Medal laureates, and six Turing Award laureates (the equivalent of the Nobel Prize in computer science). We have published one article and excerpted from the books of seven members of the British House of Lords. And there are 31 knighted professors on the site from 13 Honorary Associates, one book excerpt and 21 petition signatories. These figures are despite the never-ending assault on our email (this link reveals the targeting of our emails to, among others, a close colleague in Washington, DC as well as space advocates and Nobel laureates).

3. This is Day 406 for us living under the threat to life of a 'no fault' eviction by Peabody Trust.[1] We live in a Mayor of London's Rough Sleepers Initiative (RSI) property. Peabody's appalling new terms of tenancy have forced us into an unstable weekly periodic tenancy that poses a threat to Declan's life and inhibits our ability to exercise our rights. Declan accumulated quite a history with the Housing Ombudsman Service before he received the Ombudsman's decision not to investigate a referral from Lyn Brown MP on jurisdictional grounds. The Ombudsman was asked to consider whether or not our tenancy has been renewed like for like; and whether, if not, it should be in light of the landlord having accused us of not signing a like-for-like agreement. The Equality and Human Rights Commission will not accept a referral of discrimination from Ms Brown, the Commission's helpline (EASS) having grossly distorted the complaint against Peabody. We no longer have pro se access to the courts (see next paragraph).

4. This eviction matter came before District Judge Ruth Fine at the Central London County Court on 30 June 2020, when both counsel for St Mungo's (the charity in effective control of our tenancy) and Declan presented their positions. Declan lost the case and was ordered to pay £1,850 in costs. A publishing colleague in America cleared these costs within 24 hours of my blog post about this hearing for strike out on a related issue that was the essence of the claim, i.e., that St Mungo's would take a phone call to confirm that we are clients of the Mayor of London's RSI programme. Within a week of the hearing, St Mungo's had agreed to take this phone call for us both, the Court having ruled that they were not obliged to do so despite our circumstances. This time we escaped bankruptcy (counsel for St Mungo's asked for £3,407.50 in costs), but consider that to seek pro se access to justice in the courts has become far too dangerous for us. Declan currently has before the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman the decision of the Information Commissioner that allows St Mungo's to continue processing coercive support plans without our knowledge or consent and that also poses a threat to his life.

5. When it comes to traffic, we have had 10.7 million hits in the past three years on Facebook; however, I left the platform on 13 March 2021 for one year rather than risk being banned for life. It is indisputable that with any sort of level playing field Church and State would have far exceeded 2.5 million hits last year. In addition to a large variety of blocks without explanation, Facebook had so severely restricted our Page's distribution by October 2020 that it was almost as good as an unpublished page.[2] Currently, we are up to their 85th block since 1 December 2015, and as usual without an explanation. This block records as one half of their 3rd double block in the first five weeks of this year that lasted 60 days. Our traffic has also been curtailed by over 2.5K blocks on access to Church and State since 26 July 2016, including 29 full distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks since 17 May 2019 that have lasted for as long as 54 hours at a time.[3] About 70% of our hits are from Americans.

"This is precisely the hard hitting kind of response needed to clarify the unfair way Facebook is treating your highly reputable site." Don Collins, Founder, International Services Assistance Fund, Washington DC

Last updated: 26/06/21

_________________________

[1] Once a fixed term has elapsed, the landlord has the option to seek eviction even if the tenant has upheld their obligations in full (though of course the landlord must still apply for and obtain a county court order).

[2] 17/10/20: We have permission to publish this ISAF letter of 30 September to Facebook COO Sheryl Samberg. Facebook has so severely restricted our Page's distribution since 4 September that it's almost as good as an unpublished page

[3] Since October 2019, we have been defining a full DDoS attack as having such a high volume of up to 4-minute blocks on access to Church and State that we don't bother recording them all.

Church and State blog

Thursday, May 06, 2010

Department for Work and Pensions rewrites our history

About me

My Picks

Church and State

Blog Archive