What will it take to get an accurate P60 from the Department for Work and Pensions for the tax year 2013/14?
Part 1: Are we 'domestic extremists'? Metropolitan Police Service acknowledges receipt of Declan's request to know if he is on police databases
Updated complaint to the UN: Revised paragraph 38
38. Despite Minister Featherstone's letter to the Home Secretary in June 2010 regarding the interception of the Applicant and his wife's emails (see paragraph 6 above), there has been no response from the Home Office into why they continue to encounter problems with their email. The Applicant has also amassed irrefutable evidence relating to the sabotage of his and his wife's mail, including the non-delivery of registered items. In the case of Heavey v Haringey Council (see paragraph 24(1) above), the Applicant was denied an oral hearing which he otherwise may have been entitled to had he received an order from the Court when it was sent to him. Subsequently, the Applicant's application for an order extending time for renewing his application for permission to apply for judicial review to an oral hearing and for the file of his claim to be re-opened was refused by Mitting J (see Annex 12, Haringey Council: Order by High Court Judge Mitting, p. 35). On 19 December 2014, the Applicant complained to Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Iain Duncan Smith about the Department for Work and Pensions and the on-going manipulation of his data (see Annex 9, Department for Work and Pensions: Complaint to Secretary of State re manipulation of data, pp. 27-28). The Applicant still awaits receipt of an accurate P60 from the Department for the tax year 2013-2014, the original document having been mailed to an address that was neither authorized nor consented to by him. [emphasis added]
Three blogs back I stated that all the Information Commissioner could do for us with the Single Homeless Project was to get them to release information to us (see blog of 28 December, "Heavey v Single Homeless Project: Will the Central London County Court rule we consented to declarations for online referral that we are paying our own salaries and that we are both mentally ill, and despite our photographic evidence to the contrary?"). We are not sure what the Information Commissioner will be able to do for us to get the Department for Work and Pensions to give us a P60 for the tax year 2013/14 that they have given everybody else, but that is to whom Declan's next letter will be addressed if this e-letter to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, dated 19 December 2014, about the on-going manipulation of our data has been to no avail:
This reminds me of a quick blog I posted on 23 October titled "If you are under surveillance check your NHS records (especially your surname!)". As human rights lawyer Jules Carey put it on twitter: "Conform or suffer 'the 4 Ds' (Deny / Disrupt / Degrade / Deceive) ► #GCHQ's radical spycraft techniques by @ggreenwald http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/13/glenn-greenwald-anonymous-mass-surveillance-governments-nasa-no-place-to-hide"
Church and State website
Church and State Press
Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out -- Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty
Update: P60: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions defies the Data Protection Act 1998