Thursday, December 20, 2018

St Mungo's: Yesterday Declan finally received full data from the Mayor of London's charity - with 10 minutes to go under data protection law

This is a splendid posting which in its moderate and modest tone should encourage many others to join you!!
http://churchandstate.org.uk/about/
-Don Collins, President of ISAF, an NGO dedicated to helping women

Our Church and State website has no less than 41 Nobel Prize winners on it; for details, see this blog's sidebar under "Church and State" (updated today).
Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms formulates what is the core of free speech. "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression." In an important interpretation of this article, the European Court of Human Rights in Handyside v. UK (1976) indicated that this "freedom of expression" should be construed as follows. It "is applicable not only to 'information' or 'ideas' that are favourably received, or regarded as inoffensive, or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population." Such are the demands of that pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness without which there is no "democratic society" (see Cliteur, 2010).

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan


Declan and I are tenants of the Clearing House, which is run by St Mungo's on behalf of the Mayor of London. Yesterday evening I was convinced that Declan and I were going to spend the festive season talking about a public interest complaint of systemic maladministration involving discriminatory, unreasonable and unfair treatment by St Mungo's. Only four months ago, Declan came within days of filing in the Central London County Court a second claim against this charity in two years; see my post of 28 August, St Mungo's: Discrimination; Declan's claim against the Mayor of London's service for the Central London County Court. Still no response from St Mungo's CEO Howard Sinclair to Declan's pre-action letter (WITH UPDATE 30/8/2018). This was my email to St Mungo's Information Security Coordinator Maya Kotecha yesterday morning:

For the attention of Howard Sinclair, CEO, St Mungo's

19 December 2018

Dear Ms Kotecha,

You have asked for my consent below, but you have not said how I should show my consent.

Please could you provide my husband with the "full entry" you refer to. Under data protection law, my husband should receive the full version of the data he has requested by close of business today. Please find attached a copy of my ID.

In terms of the email as an entry note, my husband dealt with your request for the correct information in an email to Dominic Williamson yesterday (cc'd to you). It states:

Please note that: 1) at this stage in the process it is for Mr Appleton to provide the agreed upon notes in an acceptable format (not as an email), and 2) I should receive Mr Appleton's submission as a download from your information system by close of business tomorrow at the latest (please find below my third Subject Access Request reminder).

On 16 November, following his receipt of my husband's SAR, Mr Appleton advised in relation to their meeting on 30 October that "agreed upon notes uploaded and saved". However, agreed upon notes is clearly not what Mr Appleton submitted, given the email as an entry note, and what he needs to submit today. It is unreasonable and unfair to expect the client to submit agreed upon notes from a meeting.

Please note that my husband is currently considering a public interest complaint of systemic maladministration involving discriminatory, unreasonable and unfair treatment by St Mungo's.

Yours sincerely,

Maria Heavey

16 November: St Mungo's: Declan reverts to data protection law in his dealings with the Mayor of London's St Mungo's TST for the accurate recording of his complaint of unfair treatment against Newham Council (WITH UPDATE - DAY 31 19/12/2018)



From My Picks:

18 December (previous post): Mayor of London-commissioned St Mungo's: Data Tampering - Information Commissioner's Office Case Reference RFA0779534 (WITH UPDATE 20/12/2018)

County Court at Central London, Royal Courts of Justice

Heavey v St Mungo's (2016)

Trial held in the Central London County Court, Royal Courts of Justice on 20 February 2017.

On 23 August 2018, Declan complained to the Information Commissioner's Office about case notes St Mungo's Executive Director Dominic Williamson assured the Court at trial in February 2017 had been rectified by him but were in fact being held inaccurately under my name. It took the scheduling of a preliminary hearing in October 2016 to have case notes from two meetings so-called rectified by Williamson as Declan had requested all along; and that rectification only took place after a failed attempt by an international firm of solicitors, Osborne Clarke, to have Declan's claim struck out on the papers. The judge at the preliminary hearing dismissed St Mungo's application to strike out Declan's claim for compensation. DJ Avent's order dated 11 March 2017 does not state why he then dismissed the claim.

20 February 2017: Central London County Court: District Judge Avent dismisses Declan's claim against the Mayor of London-commissioned St Mungo's that alleged the falsification and fabrication of data against us (WITH UPDATE 16/3/2017)

'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty

http://churchandstate.org.uk/honorary-associates/