Saturday, November 17, 2018

We are back to non-stop blocks on access to our Church and State website (WITH UPDATE 19/11/2018)

Our Church and State website has no less than 40 Nobel Prize winners on it; for details, see this blog's sidebar under "Church and State" (updated today).


UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)
Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms formulates what is the core of free speech. "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression." In an important interpretation of this article, the European Court of Human Rights in Handyside v. UK (1976) indicated that this "freedom of expression" should be construed as follows. It "is applicable not only to 'information' or 'ideas' that are favourably received, or regarded as inoffensive, or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population." Such are the demands of that pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness without which there is no "democratic society" (see Cliteur, 2010).



We are currently experiencing Facebook's 50th block against our Church and State website since 1 December 2015; see my post of 15 November, Facebook: The social network's 50th block against our Church and State website since 1 December 2015, and with no explanation as usual (WITH UPDATE - DAY 3 17/11/2018). Now it appears that blocks on access to our Church and State website have kicked off again too. This week our web host, SiteGround, recorded 11 such blocks. (SiteGround is paid $1,000 per year to host Church and State and manage the server.) Today we have already had seven of these blocks, and this is the last day of the week!

This week:
1,394th 11 November 2018, 4.15pm
1,395th 12 November 2018, 12.05pm
1,396th 13 November 2018, 1.54am
1,397th 15 November 2018, 6.54pm
1,398th 17 November 2018, 1.30am
1,399th 17 November 2018, 6.18pm
1,400th 17 November 2018, 9.12pm
1,401st 17 November 2018, 9.23pm
1,402nd 17 November 2018, 9.26pm
1,403rd 17 November 2018, 9.28pm
1,404th 17 November 2018, 10.26pm (7)

UPDATES

1,405th 18 November 2018, 7.40pm
1,406th 19 November 2018, 12.09am
Update Summation 19 November 2018

1,406 blocks on access to our Church and State website since 26 July 2016 (89 blocks 2016; 871 blocks 2017; 446 blocks 2018); 53 blocks last May that included 6 blocks on 8 May, the same day as Declan's updated complaint to the United Nations; 42 blocks last month that included an all-time record-breaking 13 blocks on 2 October; 19 blocks this month; 11 blocks last week that included 7 blocks on 17 November; 1 block so far today (as of 19 November at 11.12am).

January 2018: 55 blocks
February 2018: 45 blocks
March 2018: 59 blocks
April 2018: 42 blocks
May 2018: 53 blocks
June 2018: 38 blocks
July 2018: 31 blocks
August 2018: 28 blocks
September 2018: 34 blocks
October 2018: 42 blocks
November 2018: 19 blocks

27 June 2018: SITE BLOCKS: The blocks on access to our Church and State website continue unabated (WITH UPDATE 19/11/2018: re 1,406th block since 26 July 2016)

And there's the ongoing assault on my primary laptop:


7 November 2018: My laptop has been targeted since 2 November. We pay British Telecom £850 per year for broadband (WITH UPDATE - DAY 18 19/11/2018)


Re: Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)

Paragraph 12 of Declan's updated complaint to the United Nations under Article 19 (freedom of expression) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

12. It is important to underscore that the discriminatory surveillance suffered by the Applicant and his wife is not an isolated event. Rather, it is emblematic of a larger pattern of surveillance by law enforcement officials in the UK that has been well-documented by international and domestic human rights bodies. For example, GCHQ's Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG) specialises in the "4 D's": deny, disrupt, degrade, deceive. It has been branded by the press as the spy agency's "deception unit". Though its existence was secret until 2014, JTRIG has developed a distinctive profile in the public understanding, after documents from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that the unit had engaged in "dirty tricks" like deploying sexual "honey traps" designed to discredit targets, launching denial-of-service attacks to shut down Internet chat rooms, pushing veiled propaganda onto social networks and generally warping discourse online. Previous reporting on GCHQ established its focus on what it regards as political radicalism. Beyond JTRIG's targeting of Anonymous, other parts of GCHQ targeted political activists and groups deemed to be "radical", even monitoring human rights NGOs. Simon Davies, founder of the London-based Privacy International, asks: "If spying on human rights NGOs isn't off limits for GCHQ, then what is?"

Is Edward Snowden a Hero or Criminal? This is a solid documentary called #Citizenfour that may influence your thinking either way:



JOIN THE CONVERSATION #CITIZENFOUR

From My Picks

8 May 2018: Threat to life: Updated complaint to the United Nations under Article 19 (freedom of expression) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Today we are cut off the internet for a half an hour


http://churchandstate.org.uk/honorary-associates/