Saturday, April 18, 2020

Peabody Trust: Declan asked Peabody CEO Brendan Sarsfield's personal response executive for an explanation for the non-renewal of our tenancy but to no avail. We are in a flat that is part of the Mayor of London's Rough Sleepers Initiative

Our website has been down for the last hour.

Our Church and State website has no less than 59 Nobel Laureates on it despite the never-ending assault on our email; see paragraph 2 under "Church and State" on this blog's sidebar (updated today).

Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms formulates what is the core of free speech. "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression." In an important interpretation of this article, the European Court of Human Rights in Handyside v. UK (1976) indicated that this "freedom of expression" should be construed as follows. It "is applicable not only to 'information' or 'ideas' that are favourably received, or regarded as inoffensive, or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population". Such are the demands of that pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness without which there is no "democratic society" (see Cliteur, 2010).


The Central London County Court is based at the Royal Courts of Justice. The hearing of the Mayor of London-commissioned St Mungo's application to have Declan's claim struck out before Senior Circuit Judge Marc Dight CBE has been adjourned to a date to be fixed.

Declan and I are housed in a flat that is part of the Mayor of London's Rough Sleepers Initiative. Alongside our tenancy is access to the Mayor's Tenancy Sustainment Team (TST) at St Mungo's. It has been acknowledged by the Greater London Authority in court papers that we can live independently – we do not have addictions or mental illness or behavioural issues. Our needs are solely related to the harassment, discrimination, intimidation and victimisation we routinely face. This is typified by the behaviour of St Mungo's during proceedings currently before the court. Last Wednesday our landlord, Peabody Trust housing association, intimated that they will not be issuing us a "renewed assured shorthold tenancy" (clause A6) before our tenancy ends next month. So now we are facing a periodic tenancy and eviction at will by the landlord from 17 May because we cannot get St Mungo's to even vouch over the phone that we are clients of theirs. The ending of our current status as tenants who are part of the Mayor's TST programme by necessity is how Peabody has interpreted appalling and dangerous new terms of tenancy that we refused to sign yesterday.[1] For a start, the acceptance by the court that this interpretation actually exists would likely render academic Declan's claim against St Mungo's for an effective failure to provide support, and might even result in costs being awarded against him for filing a spurious claim based on a necessary need for support that doesn't seem explainable allowing for this interpretation of the contract. Below is Declan's email on Wednesday to Gillian Smith of Peabody CEO Brendan Sarsfield's personal response team, who was given charge of the renewal or otherwise of our tenancy through to resolution.

On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 18:34, Declan Heavey wrote:
For the attention of Brendan Sarsfield, CEO, Peabody Trust

Dear Ms Smith,

I acknowledge receipt of Rukia Khatun's email below. Can you please provide me with your reason(s) for not providing me with a like-for-like tenancy agreement - as Peabody Trust has done twice before?

I have managed to sustain my tenancy, but to ensure that I do not face homelessness again, I need St Mungo's TST support to achieve financial independence. The same goes for my wife. The tenancy agreement we have would work for us, if only St Mungo's TST would honour their side of the contract.

Yours sincerely,

Declan Heavey

___________________________________

[1] This interpretation by Peabody reads: "In summary, we will shortly send you out a new Fixed Term Assured Shorthold Tenancy that is currently used by Peabody. Both you and your wife will continue to reside in designated Rough sleepers (RSI) bedspace but there will be no mention of a requirement to engage with TST support (emphasis added). All other terms and conditions of your current tenancy will continue to apply." This seems to us a wildly mistaken interpretation of an outrageous and thoroughly amended tenancy agreement we have refused to sign. Perhaps St Mungo's has told Peabody that we do not have a need for support that they can provide. But those in Peabody with any responsibility in this matter already know this to be false. We still await Gillian Smith's reason(s) for not providing Declan with a like-for-like tenancy agreement both in terms of the type of tenancy and the terms of the contract (reflected in clause A6 stating "renewed assured shorthold tenancy") - as has been issued twice before.

Who can say that Declan does not have opposition?

The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Headquarters in Gogarburn. The RBS owns National Westminster Bank (NatWest).


Declan currently has the Royal Bank of Scotland (along with NatWest Bank) before the Financial Ombudsman for the cancellation of a standing order on the Network for Church Monitoring business account without his knowledge or consent. And this after he received £100 compensation from the RBS in recognition of his time, travel costs and inconvenience in setting up this and another standing order over two months ago.

13 April: Royal Bank of Scotland: Despite his earlier dealings with the RBS Executive Response Team, Declan has been waiting over six weeks to learn from Natwest Bank who cancelled a standing order on the Network for Church Monitoring business account without his knowledge or consent (Financial Ombudsman case ref. PNX-3576860-D6B8)




From My Pick's:

3 April: Declan's claim against the Mayor of London-commissioned St Mungo's before Senior Circuit Judge Marc Dight CBE has been adjourned to a date to be fixed. St Mungo's TST is still unwilling to even take a phone call to confirm that we are clients of theirs

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan


What the issue in these court proceedings boils down to is whether the court will decide that Declan and I should live in a destabilised tenancy that inhibits our ability to exercise our rights and poses a threat to his life, simply because the Mayor of London-commissioned St Mungo's Tenancy Sustainment Team in North London (TST North) will not even take a phone call to confirm that we are clients of theirs. The court must surely find that this is not proportionate and lawful.

Our need for this support continues to escalate?

"Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out." Edd Doerr (1930-2020), (then) President, Americans for Religious Liberty

http://churchandstate.org.uk/about/