Tuesday, November 24, 2020

NatWest Bank: Declan responds to the Financial Ombudsman's provisional decision for their website. Pixsy had just chased for the fourth time in two weeks payment for the past use of one image on the Church and State website

Our Church and State website has no less than 59 Nobel Laureates on it despite the never-ending assault on our email; see paragraph 2 under "Church and State" on this blog's sidebar (updated today).

The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Headquarters in Gogarburn. The RBS owns National Westminster Bank (NatWest).


Declan has had RBS's NatWest before the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) since last February following the non-payment of his salary by standing order. The Financial Ombudsman has effectively found that the Executive Case Manager at RBS wouldn't have been reasonably aware when she paid Declan £100 compensation on 17 February - in recognition of issues he had experienced in setting up two replacement standing orders on the Network for Church Monitoring business account - that there had been some error previously made by NatWest in setting up the replacement standing order for the payment of his salary (an additional £75 was paid on 18 March). Declan's complaint about the subsequent cancellation of the standing order without his knowledge or consent that resulted in the non-payment of his salary on 24 February was passed by the investigator to the Ombudsman last month. His salary continues to be paid online by quick transfer from the business account to his personal account pending the ombudsman's final decision that will be published on their website. Below is his response this evening to Ombudsman Cathy Bovan's provisional decision. She is the former Team Manager at FOS and has held roles at Alliance and Leicester (now Santander). Declan's response was addressed to the investigator:

On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 17:18, Declan Heavey wrote:
Dear Ms Darbar,

Thank you for the ombudsman's provisional decision about the cancellation of the standing order without my permission that resulted in the non-payment of my salary on 24 February 2020.

The ombudsman writes: "My provisional decision is that National Westminster has already paid N £175 in recognition of the issues of setting up this standing order, and I currently think that represents fair settlement to this complaint."

On 25 February 2020, I submitted my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). Since that day, I had been waiting for NatWest to explain why my salary wasn't paid the day previous. I only first received this explanation from FOS on 8 October 2020, more than four months after NatWest had paid the £175 mentioned above. I repeat that I had not received a copy of NatWest's response to this complaint, which they say had been sent to me in March 2020.

It seems clear from the ombudsman's findings that NatWest could have updated FOS far sooner that they had responded to my complaint and they did not. I think this falls short of the service they ought to have provided, but this is not recognised in the ombudsman's provisional decision.

Yours sincerely,

Declan Heavey
Managing Director
Network for Church Monitoring

FOS investigator: "NatWest have said although the cancellation was processed on the 12th February 2020, it wasn't uploaded for processing until later – so it didn't actually cancel until the 19 February 2020."


The FOS investigator (not the ombudsman) wrote that "when the executive team wrote to you, they wouldn't have been reasonably aware a cancellation was in the system and would've seen two standing orders set up - one for your [sic] and one for your wife". This is that email from RBS Executive Case Manager Mandy Durkin:

On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 17:02, Durkin, Mandy (Executive Response Team) wrote:
Our Ref: PHO-0264121920
17 February 2020

Dear Mr Heavey

Re: Network for Church Monitoring Ltd.

Thank you for your recent emails addressed to Alison Rose, our Chief Executive. Alison has passed your correspondence to me and asked that I contact you on her behalf.

Please accept my apologies for the recent issues and poor service you have described in connection with setting up replacement standing orders. You have outlined that the instructions were taken incorrectly by Tom McKeon on your initial visit to NatWest Stratford Broadway Branch on 11 February 2020 and that you have had need to duplicate the request and visited another branch as a result.

I have discussed your concerns with Tom, who conveyed his apologies and confirmed that he had set up the instruction incorrectly and not verified the payment frequency. Regrettably, this failure has initiated your subsequent follow up contacts to the bank in order to seek correcting actions. I am sorry for the administration errors and lack of support you've described receiving. From my review of bank records I can confirm that the correcting actions are now completed in full.

All previous lapsed and incorrect standing orders have been cancelled. There are now two remaining active standing orders that have been set up as you requested, one payable to yourself and one payable to Mrs Heavey, for the amount of £140 fortnightly. The instructions are set up with an initial payment date of 24 February 2020 and a final payment date of 8 February 2021, against the reference *****400.

I am genuinely sorry for the trouble and frustration we have caused you. While there is no substitute for getting things right first time, I have credited £100 compensation to account number ending *400 in recognition of your time, travel costs and inconvenience in this case.

Once again, thank you for taking the time to bring this matter to our attention and allowing me the opportunity to address your concerns. I trust that these actions have resolved matters for you. Please don't hesitate to contact me should you have any further questions or queries in this regard.

Although I hope it won't be necessary, I am obliged to advise you that you have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge – but you must do so within six months of the date of this email. If you do not refer your complaint in time, the Ombudsman will not have our permission to consider your complaint and so will only be able to do so in very limited circumstances (for example, if the Ombudsman believes that the delay was as a result of exceptional circumstances). Further information about the service is available in their leaflet http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer-leaflet.htm and on their website www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk

Yours sincerely

Mandy

Mandy Durkin | Executive Case Manager| Customer Service & Operations | Commercial Banking

Metropolitan Police Crime Reference No. 5330050/20. On 16 October, our flat door on the 2nd floor was vandalised by two thugs with a crowbar. Declan and I were in the flat at the time and fortunately our double locked door held firm. It's my opinion that they just wanted to break the door lock but didn't have enough time. The communal door lock downstairs wasn't broken. On 11 November, the communal door lock was changed and on that same day we were informed that a carpenter will complete the repair to our flat door on 1 December.


8 November: Part 1: Housing Ombudsman Service. Declan has complained to Lyn Brown MP about this statutory service. Our flat door has been vandalised (crime reference no. 5330050/20). And ISAF's letter to Facebook's COO in September has gotten no results


I am truly appalled by the unlawful violation of the Heavey's basic right to send and receive email without interference. I would be most grateful for anything you may be able to do by way of taking measures to correct this gross abuse.

An American professor to then Home Office Minister Lynne Featherstone in 2010



21 November: It would not be an exaggeration to say that more than a thousand of our emails have been blocked this year and hundreds to one close colleague in Washington DC. My emails to space advocates are also among those targeted (previous post)




From My Picks:

24 November: For the fourth time Pixsy chase payment without a claim letter for the past non-commercial use of one image on the Church and State website. We're still waiting for Peabody Trust's final decision letter for the Housing Ombudsman to investigate the appalling new terms of tenancy on offer (newer post today)



Our list of 287 Honorary Associates includes 17 Nobel Prize laureates, 11 US National Medal of Science laureates and 12 knighted professors notwithstanding the excessive targeting of these three categories of emails in particular.

http://churchandstate.org.uk/honorary-associates/

"Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out." Edd Doerr (1930-2020), (then) President, Americans for Religious Liberty