Saturday, February 08, 2020

Death threat: This week we did not hear from the court in Declan's claim against the Mayor of London-commissioned St Mungo's and the clock is ticking down on our tenancy

14/8/19

I have looked at the long correspondence regarding your tenancy and clearly you have made a powerful case for the unconscionable behavior of the agency in control of your tenancy.

Donald A. Collins
Founder, International Services Assistance Fund

Our Church and State website has no less than 59 Nobel Laureates on it despite the never-ending assault on our email; see paragraph 2 of this blog's sidebar under "Church and State" (updated today).
Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms formulates what is the core of free speech. "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression." In an important interpretation of this article, the European Court of Human Rights in Handyside v. UK (1976) indicated that this "freedom of expression" should be construed as follows. It "is applicable not only to 'information' or 'ideas' that are favourably received, or regarded as inoffensive, or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population". Such are the demands of that pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness without which there is no "democratic society" (see Cliteur, 2010).


Declan has commenced court proceedings against the Mayor of London-commissioned St Mungo's in the County Court at Central London in the Royal Courts of Justice.

Declan and I are housed in a flat that is part of the Mayor of London's Rough Sleepers Initiative. Alongside our tenancy is access to the Mayor's Tenancy Sustainment Team (TST) at St Mungo's. It has been acknowledged by the Greater London Authority in court papers that we can live independently – we do not have addictions or mental illness or behavioural issues. Our needs are solely related to the harassment, discrimination, intimidation and victimisation we routinely face. This is typified by the behaviour of St Mungo's during proceedings currently before the Central London County Court in the Royal Courts of Justice. Last week Declan phoned the Court and was informed that his letter last December for the Judge is on the system. He was also told that we could hear from the Court this week. This, however, has not happened, and the clock is ticking down on our tenancy. Declan is presently battling through the Court falsified documentation seemingly drawn up with the sole purpose of having us evicted when our fixed term tenancy ends this coming May.

Subject: URGENT: Heavey v St Mungo's

The Court Manager
County Court at Central London
Royal Courts of Justice

Address removed for email

BY EMAIL AND RECORDED POST


16 December 2019

Dear Sir,

Claim Number: F03CL589
Claimant: Declan Heavey
Defendant: St Mungo's


I wish to bring to the Court's attention a serious development in this case almost immediately following my filing in Court and service of Claimant's Reply to Witness Statement of Ilyas Hussein on 11 December 2019.

Three days later, on 14 December, I received the results of a subject access request from the Defendant. They are truly shocking, and by far the worst the Defendant has produced against me to date.

The support terms of my tenancy agreement have been broken by these support plans and other documentation, which have been used as vehicles through which to make, inter alia, serious allegations about me without any basis in fact. The support plans and related documentation also breach assurances the Defendant has given the Court and me in the past.

The support plans, which I never knew even existed, were drawn up by the Defendant on 20 February 2019 and redrawn on 19 November 2019 as an apparent set-up for the non-renewal of my tenancy by Peabody Trust in 5 months' time. They at the very least are completely inappropriate vehicles for the Defendant to vent its animosity and hostility towards me through the use of slander and falsehood. They also undermine and contradict mutually agreed upon case notes that are loaded on the system, raising serious questions about the credibility and reliability of the Defendant and the veracity of its claims.

I can confirm that I am in possession of a support agreement that specifically states that: "There will be no support plan." This support agreement was negotiated between the Defendant and me following the equivalent of an intervention by District Judge Silverman on 3 February 2016.  

I respectfully ask that this matter of the results of my subject access request be included in my application to the Court for a declaration that the Defendant has acted unreasonably and in breach of duty towards me. 

Yours faithfully,

Declan Heavey

cc: Batchelors LLP

Batchelors Solicitors are acting for St Mungo's:

https://www.batchelors.co.uk/




From My Picks:

30 January (previous post): Newham Council: Today we learn that Declan lost 32 hours of volunteering earlier this month due to technical issues. We are still left asking, "What's next from the Council?"
Heavey v St Mungo's

What the issue in these court proceedings boils down to is whether the Court will decide that Declan and I should face the prospect of eviction back to the streets (a death threat) rather than St Mungo's take a call to confirm that we are clients of theirs, and that such a position is not harsh, unjust and unreasonable.

Our need for this support continues to escalate?

'Let me recommend an important web site churchandstate.org.uk. Operating out of London this well-designed and exciting web site covers church-state, population, climate change and other issues. Check it out.' Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty

http://churchandstate.org.uk/about/